| |
Chronology of a
scandal or why the world is not allowed to read about 'the holy grail of physics' and why Google
is doing its best to hide this site
In 1969, I had calculated the sun's orbit around the barycenter of our solar
system and drawn it on the blackboard in the presence of Prof. Weber in the
large physics
lecture hall of the TH Darmstadt (which was at that time besides Karlsruhe our
leading german technical university). This demonstration produced
echos around the world: "There
was a time, as late as the 1960s, when general relativity was
considered a theorist’s paradise and an experimentalist’s purgatory."(local
copy here) and "ironically,
while Mercury’s
perihelion advance is one of the three “crucial” tests of general
relativity, it is almost impossible to
find a modern paper that quotes the latest observational results"
(if this paper should disappear now on the arxiv server as so many
papers that this site quotes, you find a
local copy here, btw it makes
no sense to delete any of the quoted papers, all have local copies
on this server)
In 1985 I had written a MSDos program that demonstrated the rotation of
the sun around the barycenter.
In 1987 I had created an FPU version of this program
showing the
rotation of the sun around the barycenter with high precision.
Particle physicist friends of mine commented the results of this program
at the time "Incredibly,
did they (the astrophysicists)
really forget
to calculate this".
In 1987, I shared the results of this program with Dr. Herzog and
frankly explained the implementation to him.
In 1988 an article appeared in
the astronomy journal 'Sterne und Weltraum' 5/88 p.324:
"Die durch den Planetenumlauf erzeugte Bahn der
Sonne" ("The orbit of the sun generated by the planetary
orbit").
Author: Werner Herzog. All
my attempts to publish my theory of
the rotation of the sun around the barycenter of our solar system
had failed because I could not conceal the fact that Einstein's
theory of relativity would be refuted by this theory.
More than 5000 exoplanets detected
till today prove that I was right.
Obviously neither Werner Herzog nor the magazine which
published my theory recognized this fact.
In 1995, the first exoplanet was discovered by Mayor and Queloz
with an obsolete
1.93m telescope of 1958
(link deleted, see
corresponding wikipedia article here)
and a
technique which was used already 100 years earlier. It
was only the knowledge that stars wobble under the influence
of the surrounding planets that allowed them to detect the
first exoplanet system.
-
2002 my sites
sunorbit.net und sunorbit.de with an description of the solar orbit
appeared in the web. From this point on, all university publications
dealing with the discovery of exoplanets,
such as this
one, disappeared magically from the web all of a sudden. Almost all US-universities had published
in the year 2001 nearly identical very prominently presented scientific papers built around the statement of the
US-National Research
Council
(U.S. 2001 Decadal
Survey):
"The
discovery of life on another planet is potentially one of the most
important scientific advances of this century (....) and it would
have enormous philosophical implications." (This Canadian publication appeared in 2010, when all US papers
with almost the same content had long since disappeared
from the web.)
-
2019 Metin Tolan, professor of physics,
coined the expression : "the holy grail
of physics" for the discovery of the exoplanets.
Formerly the expression 'holy grail of physics' was used in
the sense of 'uniting quantum mechanics with Einstein's theory of
general relativity'. But since Einstein's theory of general
relativity is refuted by the discovery of the exoplanets, this
is no longer used.
27.05.2019 Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf publishes study "Influence
of planetary tidal forces on solar activity"
2019 Nobel Prize in Physics for
Michel Mayor
Didier Queloz
June 30, 2020:
Astronomers Have Located The Centre Of The Solar System
To Within 100 Metres. Now it was clear that also the US-physics had
realized that the solar orbit around the barycenter was not
deniable.
-
November 2020:
'Extremely aggressive' internet censorship was introduced
by
Ajit Pai
to keep
US-web users from seeing the contents of this site :
"'Extremely aggressive' internet censorship spreads in the world's
democracies" and "When
the United States repealed net neutrality, they created an
environment in which it would be easy, from a technical standpoint,
for internet service providers to interfere with or block internet
traffic," "The
architecture for greater censorship is already in place and we
should all be concerned about heading down a slippery slope."
and "But
once that blocking infrastructure is in place, governments can block
any websites they choose, and it's a very opaque process."
Censors
only hinder themself with such measures. Censorship is and
always has been a reason for the backwardness of a country. Since
years US science could otherwise have been learning on this site
that
gravitational lens effects are nothing else than effects of gas
accumulations found in 'empty space' and
Black Holes are nothing
else than effects of barycenters. The
gravitational redshift is since 1995 proven to be an effect of the
wobbling of the stars. Every student learns that these tests of
the Theory of Relativity are crucial: "Albert Einstein proposed three tests of general relativity,
subsequently called the "classical tests" of General Relativity, in
1916:
- the perihelion precession of Mercury's orbit
("it
is almost impossible to
find a modern paper that quotes the latest observational results"
)
-
the deflection of light by the Sun
-
the gravitational redshift of light"
Now that every single of these 3 tests is disproven, the whole
Theory of Relativity is disproven.
Einstein himself said in a letter to 'The Times': "The
chief attraction of the theory lies in its logical completeness. If
a single one of the conclusions drawn from it proves wrong, it must
be given up; to modify it without destroying the whole structure
seems to be impossible". If you need more
proof, read here.
June 10, 2021:
Shaken and Stirred: When Bond Meets Suess-de Vries and
Gnevyshev-Ohl: ""It
is known from the earth that spinning around on its orbit triggers
small movements in the liquid core of the earth. Something similar
also happens inside the sun, but has been neglected so far (..)."
And "We
would like to point out that meanwhile the empirical evidence for an
11.07-year synchronization is quite impressive, though not accepted
(or not even recognized) throughout the solar dynamo community."
And "the
strongest of all planetary influences on the Sun’s motion, which is
associated with the 19.86-year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn.
This cycle governs the orbit of the Sun around the barycenter of the
planetary system, comprising vast deflections in the order of the
Sun’s diameter and velocities of up to 15 m s−1"
This is exactly what my program calculated that I have been offering
for download on this site for years from the very start of this site.
-
by end of 2022
many pages as
this proove of
Einstein's Theory of Relativity disapeared from the university
servers, as this one from the stanford server, see the backup
here:
gpb-051105.html or here
(both use resources from web.archive.org, so be prepared to wait.).
June/July 2023,
US physics realized that the Sun's orbit around the
barycenter described on this site is undeniable: my complete
hard discs with all backups were destroyed by a Microsoft Windows
update action. All my programs demonstrating
the solar orbit and Mercury’s
perihelion advance considering the solar orbit around the
barycenter were destroyed by this action. The intention behind this
action was clearly to prevent any further upload of
enlightening programs and texts to the web. (Almost
exactly a year later, Microsoft's Windows kernel-mode Blue Screen
demonstrated to the whole world what it means to be dependent on a
monopoly company by paralyzing air traffic, hospitals, and other
vital infrastructure with a
BSOD. How an external company can trigger a kernel mode Blue
Screen has yet to be explained by Microsoft.
Blaming the EU now for the disaster is a bit helpless. And this
was no
hacker attack! See
also here)
Late 2023, early 2024: many leading US journals now headline "Einstein
wrong" (all titles that Google couldn't find at all). See below
January 2024
space.com publishes: Does the sun move in the solar system?
"The net result of all this is that the planets of the solar system
don't technically orbit their star. Instead, the sun and each planet
orbit a point of mutual gravity called a "barycenter,"" and
"Not only can this effect be used to spot a stellar wobble and,
therefore, detect the presence of an exoplanet, but it can also be
used to measure some of the properties of the bodies in distant
planetary systems."
|
|
| |

For almost one hundred years, the educated American middle and upper
classes had been told what a genius Albert Einstein was, even
Nature
published an article just on this and the
Times Magazine voted Einstein 'Person of the Century' and now all this
was supposed to be wrong? Against this backdrop, it must be seen
what a shock the news was that Einstein's theory had been refuted by
the discovery of the exoplanets, which clearly prove Einstein's Theory of Relativity
as build on wrong assumptions. And this is the only way
to understand how cautiously the US public is now being informed and why
everyone tries to tell you now a
different story as to why Einstein's theory of relativity must be
wrong in the end of 2023:
Links to articles telling 'Why Einstein must be wrong':
TheConversation, Academic rigour, journalistic
flair (Authors: Valerio Faraoni at Bishop's University and
Andrea Giusti at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich):
"Why
Einstein must be wrong: In search of the theory of gravity"
quotation:
"Therefore,
Einstein’s gravity cannot be the ultimate theory of gravity."
Inverse.com prints the article of TheConversation as
a
reprint:
The
Case Against Einstein: Why the Physicist's Most Popular Theory Must Be
Wrong"" and Feb. 10, 2024
"How
Oppenheimer Proved Einstein Wrong About Black Holes - Inverse"
phys.org reprints TheConversation-article (phys.org is one of the major
physics journals in the US):
"Why
Einstein must be wrong: In search of the theory of gravity"
also newspaceeconomy.ca
reprints TheConversation-article:
https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/02/05/why-einstein-must-be-wrong-in-search-of-the-theory-of-gravity/
Popular Mechanics May 9, 2024 (Popular Mechanics
has biggest influence on the non-academic public in the USA)
"Scientists
Found a Startling Glitch in Einstein’s Theory of Relativity"
The
Scientific American April, 9 2024
(Scientific American has biggest influence on the academic public in the
USA):
"Could
Gravitational-Wave ‘Memories’ Prove Einstein Wrong?" "On
the other hand, we could really use a way to move past Einstein. We know
that his theory is incomplete." "then
we may have found a chink in relativity’s nigh-impervious armor, one
that we might leverage and pry open to expose this cherished theory’s
deeper flaws and put us on firmer ground for devising a better theory of
gravity."
Lifescience
May 15,
2024:
"Newfound
'glitch' in Einstein's relativity could rewrite the rules of the
universe, study suggests"
In England TheTimes writes on Feb. 23, 2024:
Was Einstein wrong? These British scientists think he might have been
wrong "Scientists in the UK have made a giant leap towards proving
Albert Einstein wrong"
BBC
2023-10-24
“Einstein Was Wrong” New Study Of Universe
Poses Fundamental Questions or see it on
Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCnzhpH3ZdQ.)
The Newscientist has a whole lot of articles
to this theme
https://www.newscientist.com/round-up/challenging-einstein/
or:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2435613-einsteins-theory-was-wrong-about-black-holes-made-out-of-light/
or
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2416211-einstein-may-be-wrong-about-how-mirrors-travelling-at-light-speed-work/
The Businessinsider on Apr 5, 2024:
https://www.businessinsider.com/largest-cosmic-map-new-understanding-dark-energy-universe-expansion-einstein-2024-4
phys.org on June 17, 2024 :
Einstein's other theory of
gravity could have the recipe to relieve 'Hubble trouble'
sciencetimes.com:
https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/47123/20231115/einstein-wrong-theory-gravity-shortcomings-explaining-universe.htm
many more here (this time
it's the winners of the nobel prize who proved Einstein wrong) ......
....
.....
if you want to read the
real reason, see here...
It is absolutely unbelievable how primitively the people that
Edward Snowden
made public are trying to
prevent this scandal from getting known to the world. When I edited this page and
wanted to put it online, my entire screen went black and the computer
became unusable. Only extensive changes later allowed me to upload this
page. And every time I edit this page these people insert
some small errors on the page ("tthen !!! we may have found a chink in relativity’s nigh-impervious armor, one that we might leverage and pry open to expose this cherished theory’s deeper flaws and put us on firmer ground for devising a better theory of gravity.").
As soon as this page was online different big server centers copied
all my pages in big hand style to buffer my site:


|
|